That’s Not an ACO!

By Gregg A. Masters, MPH

One of the last ‘super PHOs’ standing circa the blood bath, grand ‘risk push-back’ and subsequent unwinding of many physician/hospital JVs of the 90s, Advocate Health Partners (aka @AdvocateHealth) and it’s aligned payor partner, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Illinois (aka @BCBSIL) went public with their commercial ACO results last week. For complete announcement, click here.

The net takeaway can be summarized as follows:

[though limited to 6 months of data] results thus far are inconclusive but are encouraging

Advocate Health Care is by anyone’s definition a mature integrated delivery system emerging from the independent physician community space though tethered to an institutional partner, vs. the retooling of a closed system to more effectively integrate with the private medical community, i.e., Kaiser, Mayo et al.

The piece, though clearly hedging a ‘good news and bad news’ message, none-the-less settles on the upside of proactive collaboration by the provider community with their local market payor partner.

Yet, what I find of particular interest and worthy of further consideration is the comment proffered by author, lecturer and seasoned veteran in the HMO, and managed competition space, William DeMarco as follows:

This is not an Accountable Care Organization as the shared savings formula and results of quality improvement are put on the back burner in favor of replacing revenue lost in inpatient care. Bundled payment BY ITSELF will not improve care or make providers remove waste from the system, rather providers will merely try and recover what they were loosing by delivering preventable and avoidable care.

So what do you think? Is Bill being too hard on Advocate et al? Or might we be best advised to let ‘innovation’ manifest granularly by local communities of practice vs. against the rules as codified by CMS in the Affordable Care Act & sequelæ?

The Braintrust of Accountable Care aka AMGA Descends Upon San Diego: Who Knew!

By Gregg A. Masters, MPH

In a chance conversation with my friend, fellow ‘healthtweep’ and patient empowerment co-conspirator Dave DeBronkart, aka @epatientdave, I learned yesterday that AMGA aka @theAMGA was holding their annual meeting in San Diego.

This is perhaps the largest concentration of ‘doers’ in the accountable care movement. Many participated in the landmark Physician Group Practice demonstration project which though reporting mixed results none-the-less added to the pool of knowledge and case studies on advancing accountable care.

More later from this ‘resource rich’ health innovation gathering of thought leaders and demonstrators! Below is a select stream of tweets from the event tagged as #AMGA12 (for most recent digital footprint based on last 50 tweets, click here):

TweetReach Report for #AMGA12

Reached 28,389 accounts reached via exposure of 178,271impressions

highest exposure

most mentioned

8mentions

Most Retweeted Tweets

braddodge: Fisher: only way to change future is to create it (a la Drucker) #AMGA12 #in

2healthguru: @ePatientDave pitching #AMGA12via Saturday keynote ‘How Participatory Medicine Can Help Improve the Practice of Medicine’#s4pm

contributors 
Tweets RTs Impressions
1 2healthguru 24 1 138,632
2 Cascadia 3 0 10,648
3 ePatientDave 1 0 9,940
4 ideasurge 1 0 7,471
5 MatthewBrowning 1 0 5,288
6 braddodge 11 1 2,750
7 benatgeo 1 0 2,021
8 theAMGA 1 0 734
9 CejkaSearch 1 0 281
10 HalleyConsults 1 0 268
11 krishna_gr 1 0 171
12 SPiHealthcare 1 0 53
13 HDirections 1 0 10
14 Uggliest 2 0 4

 tweets timeline 

Mar 9, 2012 at 4:52pm UTC

braddodge: Hansen: bad collaboration is worse than none at all#AMGA12. Stakes are high. 3 minutes ago

2healthguru: RT @VinceKuraitis: What’s the Difference Beteween ACOs and “AC-Like” Arrangements? bit.ly/wRQiu8#ACO#HCR#amga12 3 minutes ago
2healthguru: Tweepls check out & monitor tweets for @theAMGA conference Twub for hashtag #amga12 attwubs.com/amga12 4 minutes ago
braddodge: Legit creds for Morten Hansen: PhD in business admin from Stanford #AMGA12 5 minutes ago
braddodge: Virginia Mason Medical Center uses Toyota Production System to achieve quality objectives and eliminate waste. #AMGA12 10 minutes ago
braddodge: Virginia Mason Medical Center wins Preeminence award #AMGA12 14 minutes ago
2healthguru: Collaboration: An Interview with Morten T Hansen @GreatbyChoice | bit.ly/Ajswuu#AMGA12 14 minutes ago
Cascadia: @2healthguru: What to make of anemic Tweetstream from resource rich #AMGA12 conference? Great opportunity to control the message 17 minutes ago
2healthguru: ‘Bad collaboration worse than none..’ @GreatbyChoice#AMGA12 19 minutes ago
braddodge: Nesse: Gotta haves: network of providers, Aligned financial model, Coordinated care, practice Analytics.#AMGA12 20 minutes ago
2healthguru: What to make of anemic Tweetstream from resource rich #AMGA12 conference? Best & brightest in accountable care not leveraging #hcsm 20 minutes ago
braddodge: Dr Nesse: work in the part the problem YOU can address. #AMGA12 23 minutes ago
braddodge: Dr Nesse: stakeholders define problems in hc based on different perspectives. #AMGA12 25 minutes ago
2healthguru: whoa! >> RT @braddodge: Dr. Nesse from Mayo: 70 percent will receive govt sponsored hc in next decade.#AMGA12 29 minutes ago
2healthguru: RT @theAMGA: Welcome to 2012 Annual Conference! Our first general session featuring @GreatbyChoiceMH is about to start! #AMGA12 29 minutes ago
braddodge: Dr. Nesse from Mayo: 70 percent will receive govt sponsored hc in next decade. #AMGA12 30 minutes ago
theAMGA: Welcome to all of our 2012 Annual Conference attendees! Our first general session featuring @GreatbyChoiceMH is about to start! #AMGA12 31 minutes ago
ideasurge: Indeed RT @2healthguru: RT @braddodge: Fisher: only way to change future is to create it #AMGA12 #in 32 minutes ago
2healthguru: RT @braddodge: Fisher: only way to change future is to create it (a la Drucker) #AMGA12 #in 34 minutes ago
2healthguru#AMGA12 keynote on collaboration (go figure) @UCBerkeley Prof Morten T Hansen aka @GreatbyChoice preso here: bit.ly/zDsxjQ 34 minutes ago
braddodge: Fisher: MC patients with 4 chronic conditions requires collaboration between 86 physicians and 36 practices. #AMGA12 35 minutes ago
braddodge: Fisher: only way to change future is to create it (a la Drucker) #AMGA12 #in 38 minutes ago
braddodge: Don Fisher kicks off #AMGA12 general session. #inFull house. Attendance is up. 43 minutes ago
HalleyConsults#AMGA12 attendees will receive a copy of Marc Halley’s Physician Integration Economics on capturing market share w/primary care practices.

Mar 9, 2012 at 4:00pm UTC

2healthguru: Timely! New program to study how to use primary care workforce more effectively rwjf.ws/zhkvHd via @RWJF #AMGA12 about 1 hour ago
Cascadia#AMGA12 American Medical Group Association @theamga presentations vsb.li/melNtR @Farzad_ONC & @ePatientDave keynote about 1 hour ago
Cascadia: RT @krishna_gr Mistakes fledgling ACOs will make ULA Dr. Shortell Failure 2 engage patients in self-care & informed choice #AMGA12 about 1 hour ago
2healthguru: One of the first pieces I’ve seen addressing role of voluntary medical staff organization in accountable care |bit.ly/yiLZ4S #AMGA12 about 1 hour ago
2healthguru: Morning tweepls! The epi-center of integrated & accountable care is in San Diego. Follow #AMGA12 hashtag for insights. #aco about 1 hour ago
SPiHealthcare: Now is the time for optimum performance in#healthcare. Visit us at #AMGA12 booth 115 to learn more!on.fb.me/wcCX1V @theAMGA about 1 hour ago

Mar 9, 2012 at 3:00pm UTC

CejkaSearch: Attend our featured presentations during the#AMGA12 Annual Conference. booth 518.cejkasearch.com/amga2012/ about 2 hours ago

Mar 9, 2012 at 2:00pm UTC

HDirections: @HDirections CEO Daniel J. Marino speaking tomorrow at @AMGA conf. in SanDiego: The Nuts and Bolts of Hosp. & Med. Group Integration #AMGA12

Mar 9, 2012 at 8:00am UTC

krishna_gr: RT @2healthguru: The triple aim: one picture tells @_HealthPartners story: yfrog.com/odczwcp#AMGA12 #aco about 9 hours ago

Mar 9, 2012 at 6:00am UTC

benatgeo: RT @2healthguru: Patients at center = the accountable care driver | yfrog.com/ny6mukp#AMGA12#aco about 12 hours ago
Uggliest: @2healthguru hey bud follur me i hav a secrut fir ya’ hav ta noe #amga12 #aco about 12 hours ago
2healthguru: That’s a wrap on #AMGA12 preso’s. More tomorrow! #aco about 12 hours ago
Uggliest: @2healthguru howdaya drive haelthcar to duh markit? an wat duz agircultin grain with a tool bee adventaguz? watz duh vantage? #AMGA12 #aco about 12 hours ago
2healthguru: Integrating Roles & Governance of the Organized Medical Staff & Large Health System-owned Group Practice |bit.ly/yiLZ4S#amga12 #aco about 12 hours ago

Mar 9, 2012 at 5:00am UTC

2healthguru: CMS bundled payment program [graphic] |yfrog.com/ocxj2pp#amga12 #aco about 12 hours ago
2healthguru: What a surprise! Seen one comp plan, you’ve seen one! yfrog.com/obde1sp#AMGA12 #aco about 13 hours ago
2healthguru: Physician incentive payment guidelines |yfrog.com/nub4xp#AMGA12 #aco about 13 hours ago

Mar 9, 2012 at 4:00am UTC

ePatientDave: RT @2healthguru: @ePatientDave pitching#AMGA12 via Saturday keynote ‘How Participatory Medicine Can Help Improve the Practice of Medicine’ #s4pm about 13 hours ago
2healthguru: Physician compensation: what we’ve learned…then and now. | yfrog.com/nzd96yp #AMGA12 #aco about 13 hours ago
2healthguru: The triple aim: one picture tells @_HealthPartners story: yfrog.com/odczwcp #AMGA12 #aco about 13 hours ago
2healthguru: Transforming Ourselves to Achieve Triple Aim Results and Position Us for the World of #ACOs | bit.ly/w4qVaV #AMGA12 about 13 hours ago
2healthguru: @ePatientDave pitching #AMGA12 via Saturday keynote ‘How Participatory Medicine Can Help Improve the Practice of Medicine’ #s4pm about 13 hours ago
2healthguru: Evolving Physician Compensation Models in a Post-Health Reform Era | bit.ly/yRJXQH #AMGA12 #aco about 13 hours ago
MatthewBrowning: RT @2healthguru: OMG Tweep alert! @theAMGA is meeting in San Diego & I just found out chatting with @ePatientDave. Follow hashtag #AMGA12 about 13 hours ago

Accountable Care: In Search of Anchor Business Model(s) for the ‘All In’ Healthcare Eco-system

By Gregg A. Masters, MPH

Part One in a continuing series exploring the ‘all in’ healthcare eco-system (as enumerated by Reed Tuckson, MD aka @DrReedTuckson below)

There is no room in the cost curve to accommodate things that don’t add value

An article published late last night titled ‘Hospital Groups Will Get Bigger, Moody’s Predicts‘ presented itself while I was just preparing for the extraction process after a long day of engaging with the continued saga of health reform, accountable care, and the delivery mechanisms to witness their growth and efficacy. So I was too tired to do anything but re-tweet the article. This morning energized by caffeine and a modest sense of being untethered from some very important dialogue elsewhere, I am compiling this blog post.

My series of tweets which afford the context of the essential heartburn I experienced reading these ‘deja-vu’ of sorts headlines (I intend to offer further rationale and context interspersed with the tweets) are posted below:

But first up, is the ‘cognitive dissonance’ trigger [as in, you must be kidding, right?]:

2healthguru: Food for thought? NEJM: Patient-centered care poor solution to doctor-centered care bit.ly/Azvc9a via @lsaldanamd #s4pm #epatients

To wit I note an another conventional wisdom assertion (though the track record of strategic market projections may be a little suspect i.e., the mortgage meltdown):

2healthguru: Bond issuer’s think they know healthcare. ‘Hospital Groups Will Get Bigger; Unlikely Partnerships Could Emerge’ bit.ly/Ach16K #aco

Somewhat reminiscent of the crystal ball forecasts of the best and brightest circa mid 1980’s…

2healthguru: Sanford Bernstein’s Abramowitz predicted by the year 2000 there would not be any non-profit hospitals in US. #aco

With reference to the potential over-reach of the Moody’s headline I remind…

2healthguru: Context people. The world wasn’t presented in the last 24 hours! #aco #healthreform

Then the seemingly and perpetually elusive strategic challenge in healthcare, i.e., realizing the proper alchemy between vision and execution as metaphorically enumerated by Dan Fogelberg:

‘..it’s never easy and it’s never clear, who’s to navigate and who’s to steer, and so your flounder drifting ever near the rocks…’

Contrary to the likes of Jeff Goldsmith’s bold and erroneous assertion, that finance and delivery need not be integrated to satisfy & restain the ‘rapacious appetite’ of the healthcare conundrum…

2healthguru: If context is king, history is its oxygen. Leading & bleeding edge sit side by side at alter of c-suite success. Who are you listening to?

So will it be well intended ‘deja-vu all over again’, or have we really learned something this time? Judging from a recent HealthLeaders Media CFO survey, I am not particularly encouraged that we’ve resolved the ‘cultural conflict’ (or perhaps better framed as Deming’s – ‘It is not necessary to change. Survival is not mandatory’) challenge wherein Fogelberg existentially frames the elusive blend between vision, strategy and operations by hospitals or their system parents!

2healthguru: On Moodys: One more time, the ‘finance guys’ are disproportionately represented in the strategy domain. bean counters are not strategists!

I then offer select context from a very large pool of ‘strategic misfires’ aided and abetted by the best and brightest thinkers including the then ‘Big Six’…

2healthguru: Some not too distant strategic gaffs proffered by ‘bean counters’: American Medical International forms AMICARE. #aco #healthreform

2healthguru: Hospital Corporation of America private labels with The Equitable to form Equicor. #aco #healthreform

2healthguru: VHA forms Partners Health Plan in association with Aetna. #aco #healthreform

2healthguru: Aetna merges with US Healthcare. From Aetna, glad I met ya, to Leonard Abramson’s, ‘my way or the highway..’ #aco #healthreform

2healthguru: The ‘ownership churn’ from AMI, to HealthTrust, to Columbia, to Galen, to Epic, to Quorum to you name it, was an unending ‘happy hour’. #aco

2healthguru: The constant? Docs & patients. Left high & dry while hosp ownership rotated like gas prices. NOT an ‘all in healthcare eco-system’ #aco

2healthguru: We need to really think about and flesh out the value proposition in healthcare equation. What/who should be the anchor business model? #aco

2healthguru: Christensen started the conversation, but didn’t answer in Innovator’s Prescription. We need competition of the ‘right kind’. #aco

This led to the following concluding thought/admonition of sorts:

2healthguru: When bondholders drive strategy, it’s all about debt service coverage, not innovation. How does driving via the rear view mirror work? #aco

As mentioned in the introduction, this is a series on the pursuit of the ‘all in heathcare eco-system’ a term I first heard used at the Digital Health Summit at CES 2012 in Las Vegas via United HealthGroup’s Dr Reed Tuckson, Senior VP for Medical Affairs, a man who in my book get’s it.

For Dr. Tuckson’s opening remarks, click here.

As someone who AHIP’s senior brass may not count as a friend per se, i.e., I have been rather critical of their stewardship of the industry since it’s GHAA roots, between the likes of Dr. Tuckson and Mark T. Bertolini, CEO of Aetna aka @mtbert, I actually have some hope for a re-aligned payor community as partner/enablers of ‘patient centered’ accountable care.

L. Gordon Moore, MD on the Role of Primary Care in Accountable Care

By Gregg A. Masters, MPH

In a week when Blue Shield of California served Monarch Healthcare as proxy for Optum aka United HealthGroup a $10.5 million damages demand for arbitration enumerating a number of contractual breaches, the following headline was also in the news (for full article, click here):

Doctors decry Kern Medical Center cut of family medicine [residency] program

Say what? They must be kidding, right? Accountable care, the pursuit of the holy grail ‘triple aim’ and hope from health IT to connect the disconnected and compensate for a silo-ed based sick care eco-system are on everyone’s [with a pulse] radar these days. Certainly health wonks and senior clinical and institutional leadership know primary care is an essential ingredient for any ‘high performing’ health system, and that we face a current shortage as well as imbalance between primary v. specialty care in the US. Yet somehow it makes sense to clamp down on sorely needed primary care capacity?

Fortunately to offer some timely insights as to the role of primary care in accountable care I chatted with thought leader L. Gordon Moore, MD, President of Ideal Medical Practices on Wednesday, March 7th, 2012. We cover some ground from hospital or institutionally led ACOs, to the promise of bundling or outcome based payment to the role of the patient in the ACO.

To listen to the interview, click here.

[Re-post] The ‘Medical Aggregators’: Are We Entering Round Deux?

By Gregg A. Masters, MPH

[Originally written by @2healthguru on June 1, 2010 at 11:00 AM]

First a little historical context:

For those with a healthcare ‘event horizon’ slightly more seasoned than the current health reform ‘conversation’, you might remember the initial round of aggregation in medicine lead by disruptive nameplates such as MedPartners (now operating the PBM CareMark), PhyCor, FPA Medical Management, and their second or third tier physician practice management ‘me too’ copycats.

They all emerged from a robust round of venture capital backed industry determination tagged as ‘PPMC’s’, i.e., physician practice management companies. These ‘aggregators’ were the darlings of Wall Street for a while, though with some exceptions, i.e., US Oncology (formerly Physician Reliance Network), most witnessed relatively short life spans, from IPO to unwinding in perhaps a 10 year run (see: MedPartners collapse and Aftermath).

Yet, despite the promise outlined in the offering prospectus’, why did these entities fail so miserably as the ‘white knight’ consolidators or aggregators of a multi-trillion dollar ‘cottage medical industry’? Their business model proferred essentially three core benefits:

  1. Centralized, standardized and more efficient back office medical administrative management
  2. Scale of market asset concentration and therefore increased sophistication and leverage (improved pricing) with third party payor negotiation, and downstream contract management; and
  3. Serve as an ‘anchor play’ with respect to the broader design and implementation of rational though market based local delivery organization and financing, i.e., PPMC’s would harness and more effectively articulate a business culture among physicians that valued clinical integration, medical risk management, and ultimately the allocation of limited health care resources

At least this was the longer term expectation from a ‘win/win’, i.e., payor and provider perspective, of the more established players. Most however, in an effort to demonstrate value (i.e., earn their management fee) to their physician boards, focused on short term margin improvement (better rates, focus on more profitable services via improved payor mix, maximizing the contract revenue/recovery cycle, and reduced overhead, etc.), vs. the strategic focus of managing the risk (both quality and cost) of their local population (i.e., enrolled members).

So rather quickly the strategic basis of the PPMC appeal was subordinated to a short term focus (i.e., increasing net revenues) due to a rising chorus of claims that at its core the business model was merely a third party ponzi scheme which introduced another mouth to feed from an increasingly constrained health care supply chain.

Net/net, the PPMC industry flamed out big time and did not fulfill its ‘roll-up’ promise of the practice of medicine. Now many years later, we are at another tipping point. Witness the current round of promising vehicles with a similar vision of organizing physicians. These candidates include: hospital systems, health plans, integrated delivery systems, emerging ACOs, medical homes,  and even niche play organizers in the concierge, or direct practice space including SignatureMDMDVIPHealthAccess Rhode IslandCarePracticeQliance, and HelloHealth, as well as the rapidly emerging series of retail pharmacy sponsored primary care clinics, e.g., CVS/CareMark Minute Clinic, etc.

Too many docs are unwilling to risk the capital of private practice, and instead are looking to hook-up with one or more of these institutional or VC backed entrepreneurial sponsors. Will they succeed where their predecessors failed? If so, why?

From my perspective, it will clearly depend on the business model chosen to enable competition of the ‘right variety’, and the degree to which the venture embraces, nurtures and expresses physician culture that values collaborative group practice. Top down, corporate strategies dependent upon an over worked and out gunned medical director or VP of medical affairs will miss the mark. The more likely way for these ventures to succeed is by ‘baking’ the culture from the ground up. In other words, ‘seed it and they will come’. One of my mentors (Ernest Holmes) once wrote long ago:

the soil can’t argue with the seed.

Lets nourish the soil first, then make sure we plant the seeds with the right constitution and vision.

ACO’s: It Ain’t Just About ‘Health IT’

By Gregg A. Masters, MPH

We’ve been somewhat on an unexpected hiatus since HiMSS 2012 in Las Vegas, but are now back with intent to assimilate and interpret the subtext or tea leaves driving the transformation towards accountable care. I will leave that update to another blog post, but for now, a quick comment on two newsworthy items reported last week.

First is the demand for arbitration filed by Blue Shield of California against Monarch Healthcare, among other ‘breaches’ claims a violation of the assignment provision in their contract by agreeing to be acquired by the United Health Group subsidiary OptumHealth.

Second as correctly identified by Barbara Duck aka @MedicalQuack on the potential pandora’s box these ‘acquisitions’ may stimulate via as series of non arms length wholly owned subsidiary transactions, click here.

But first, a perspective to the well intended but occasionally over-simplified (from a business model & market dynamics point of view) EHR and health IT evangelical flank: better know your [provider] market!

Things may not be as they seem!

Absent full economic integration, the provider marketplace is a ‘hodgepodge’ of less than transparent business relationships, often with poorly aligned if not outright conflicting reimbursement rules, driven by variable state and federal laws including local market practices. For example, some states operate under a ‘corporate practice of medicine’ doctrine, while others do not. Such state law directly impacts the type of permissible entities that can pass as ‘physician driven’ in one ‘market’ vs. another (contrast California to Florida). It influences how physicians can be hired, the terms under which contracts are entered into and the means by which professional services can be legally provided.

Yet, take into consideration the following:

  • most physicians remain in solo to small group practice
  • few operate with fully functional EHR’s to date
  • while the FTC and DOJ are enabling clinical integration absent legal integration as a permissible form to pool physicians together into ‘virtual’ potentially accountable units absent anti-trust risk

In the aggregate above, it can be quite reasonably concluded by some that all that’s needed to enable accountable care is merely stitching via ‘IT infrastructure’ these discrete physicians or small group practices together under an umbrella digital spine, and voila, we have accountable care.

Not so fast, unfortunately this assumption grossly distorts the underlying DNA or nature of the provider marketplace in 80+% of US communities. Get to know the often opaque ‘underbelly’ of your provider community. Managed care introduced quite a bit more than just discounted medicine!

Accenture: Making the Case for Connected Health

By Gregg A. Masters, MPH

Great timing and contextually rich, Accenture released their report ‘Making the Case for Connected Health’ with some surprising observations to some, including this blogger. For the complete report, click here.

To recap, the major findings include:

  • Connected health is a must. Governments around the world see connected health as a critical and essential means to improve citizens’ access to quality, lower-cost healthcare. Connected health has gained a high level of acceptance, and there is a prevailing view that without a solid connected health platform, it will be difficult to meet today’s—and future—health challenges.
  • Integration is possible. Connected health can and will work with deep and varying underlying industry structures. Different countries have very different provider systems, and these are unlikely to change in the near term. All are fragmented, but in different ways. Healthcare IT connectivity helps bridge this fragmentation to provide better integration.
  • Connected health is on a self-sustaining path. Quality and performance measures require an integrated look at the data. These measures also increase the need for additional information, which, in turn, boosts the need for healthcare IT, and process change to enable such measures.

Via U.S. Ahead of Other Countries in Physician Health IT Adoption at iHealthbeat, we can also note the following key facts:

  • About 62% of U.S. specialty physicians use electronic tools to improve administrative efficiency, compared with the global average of 49%
  • 54% of U.S. primary care physicians use electronic prescribing, compared with a global average of 20%
  • 48% of U.S. physician specialists send orders electronically, compared with a global average of about 36%
  • 38% of U.S. primary care doctors have electronic access to clinical data about patients who have been seen by a different health care provider, compared with a global average of 33%
  • 17% of U.S. physicians have given patients electronic access to their own health data, compared with a global average of 8%.

During a Booz Allen Hamilton webinar titled, Electronic Health Records 2.0: What Does the Future Hold?, Peter Basch, MD, FACP; Medical Director, Ambulatory EHR and Health IT Policy; MedStar Health, quoting the Accenture report remarked on percent of US physicians (vs. global average) using EHRs, HealthIT, e-perscribing, is now ‘..the highest in the world… [followed by laughter, the] I’ll have to change all my slides.’ Entire audio clip here.

The time is now, accountable care is here to stay, health reform legal disposition notwithstanding.

Accountable Care and HiMSS 2012

By Gregg A. Masters, MPH

On the Wednesday, February 15th 2012 broadcast at 11AM Pacific/2PM Eastern, my special guest on the HIMSS 2012 Countdown Series was Vince Kuraitis,  aka @VinceKuraitis, publisher of the ‘e-care Management blog.We spoke on the connection between ‘HIT Platforms and accountable care.’

We’re one week out from the HIMSS 2012 conference in Las Vegas, and the anticipation is palpable. For conference details, click here.

One of the key events I plan on covering via HealthGeek.tv is the eCollaboration Forum on Thursday, February 23rd.

As we debate the pathways to enable the accountable care vision the role of health information technology is at the core of those discussions.

As additional context, you might want to download the free eHealth Initiative survey, see: ‘Support for Accountable Care: Recommended Health IT Infrastructure‘, highlights duly noted by Neil Versel at Interoperable IT Crucial For Accountable Health Organizations.

CLOUD (Consortium for Local Ownership and Use of Data) Inc CEO on ‘N of 1 Accountable Care’

By Gregg A. Masters, MPH

On the Friday, February 10th, 2012 broadcast of ‘This Week in Accountable Care’ I had the pleasure of chatting with Gary Lee Thompson, aka @GaryLeeThompson, and @CLOUDhealth on Twitter.

As the second installment in our HIMSS 2012 countdown to Las Vegas, we spent some time getting to know Gary, understanding both his tech (and legal) background as well ‘the storm’ of 2003 (see: A View from Gary: Survivorship is Not a Phase) when the diagnosis of cancer was presented to he and his wife Maureen, concurrent with her learning she had passed the boards for licensure as an architect to practice in the state of Texas.

Gary is a thought leader who has proposed a vision of a re-fabricated internet, where the ‘you’ and the ‘what’ are contextually connected in real time and wrapped in a dynamic state of ‘you’ rights driven tag access to disparate health information silos.

We discuss his vision and it’s relationship to enabling accountable care. To listen to an archived replay of the broadcast, click here.

For more information on Gary and the consortium, see: ‘CLOUDinc‘.

Wag The Dog: Will Subacute Providers Drive Upstream Innovation?

By Gregg A. Masters, MPH

One of the more interesting and perhaps developing trends to watch in fledgling accountable care enterprises or ACOs is the blueprint adopted for their chosen pathways towards integration (clinical, economic or legal). Since all healthcare is [hyper] local and, once you’ve seen an ACO, you’ve seen one ACO its vital to appreciate not just the nuances of strategy differentials but the fundamental structural imprint of the local or regional delivery system.

As I have written before not only have we built our cathedrals of medicine separated by ‘moats and silos’ from the very people they serve, i.e., patients, but also the tapestry of service delivery is more often than not laced together in a provider driven discontinuous pattern of relationship driven referral practices, vs a patient centric approach.

Typically, top dog in the provider referral footprint food chain is the general or acute health care hospital, or regional referral center. All others are niche speciality play competitors or network integrated service extensions, i.e., ASC’s, free standing cancer centers, urgent care, etc.

Most of the network creation and management effort has focused on the acute care side. Yet as emerging ACOs begin to shift the focus from individual to population level health outcomes management, aided by certain economic consequences of potentially improper care management, i.e., readmits within 30 days of discharge, there is a renewed vigor with which the upstream providers’ (hospital, academic or regional referral medical center) examine their relationship with their ‘downstream providers’, i.e., the subacute world of SNF’s, Rehab facilities, home health agencies, case managers, medical assisted living, etc.

After all who is in a better position to judge the quality of the ‘output’ from the upstream factory, than the downstream recipients (both institutional and professional) of their work?

It seems as we look to quality of care and broad spectrum clinical risk management issues, particularly from a potential readmit point of view, the voice of the downstream players will now matter more than it has to date.

Perhaps we’ll even see a spate of acquisitions and mergers to place the downstream network into the tapestry of upstream acute care practices. From EHR to HIE nervous systems to clinical pathways of collaboration there will be much re-engineering on tap.